Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 4279 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Core i5-2500K
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $163.04 vs $495.36
- Up to 58% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.95 vs $2.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 29% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-2500K - 221 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
171
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
100%
Price, $
$163.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $163.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6797 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
221
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.24/FPS
42%
Price, $
$495.36
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $495.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6797 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2500K | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |