Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3588 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Core i5-2500K
- Up to 45% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - $163.04 vs $294.95
- Up to 34% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 5900X - $0.95 vs $1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 19% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-2500K - 203 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
171
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
100%
Price, $
$163.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $163.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6796 minutes ago
Buy for $294.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6796 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2500K | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |