Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 3101 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Core i5-2500K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 50% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-2500K - 391 vs 261 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $93.99 vs $163.04
- Up to 61% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-2500K - $0.24 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 12 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $163.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
391
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2500K | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |