In Control, the Core i5-2500K is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-2500K
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 3% faster in Control – 254 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Control
- Is 13 years and 11 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 13 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
Core i5-2500K vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2500K vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2500K vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2500K Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$216.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
