In Rust, the Core i5-2500K is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $284 cheaper!
Core i5-2500K
- Up to 64% cheaper – $162.97 vs $447.16
- Up to 64% cheaper
- Up to 51% better value in Rust – $0.77 vs $1.58/FPS
- Up to 51% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 35% faster in Rust – 283 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 35% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-2500K vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
210 FPS
74%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
45%
Price, $
$162.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
283 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
100%
Price, $
$447.16
36%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
49%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2500K vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2500K vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2500K Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$216.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
