In Atomfall, the Core i5-2500K is slower than the Core i9-13900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-2500K
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-2500K vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2500K vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2500K vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2500K Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$216.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
