In Atomfall, the Core i5-2500K is slightly slower than the Core i7-8700T. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $112 cheaper!
Core i5-2500K
- Up to 41% cheaper – $162.97 vs $275.00
- Up to 41% cheaper
- Up to 35% better value in Atomfall – $0.85 vs $1.31/FPS
- Up to 35% better value in Atomfall
Core i7-8700T
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 209 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 2 months newer – Apr 02, 2018 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 7 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-2500K vs Core i7-8700T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
191 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
92%
Price, $
$162.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$275
59%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
65%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2500K vs Core i7-8700T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2500K vs Core i7-8700T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
92%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2500K Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| $216.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
