In Atomfall, the Core i5-2500K is slightly faster than the Celeron 847. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-2500K
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 192 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
Celeron 847
- Is 5 months and 8 days newer – Jun 19, 2011 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 5 months and 8 days newer
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 17 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 82% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-2500K vs Celeron 847: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2500K vs Celeron 847 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2500K vs Celeron 847 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
33%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2500K Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 19th, 2011 |
| $216.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 17W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
