In Atomfall, the Core i5-2500 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2678 v3. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-2500
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 95 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 21% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 204 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-2500 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2500 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2500 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2500
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2500 Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2678 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
