In F1 25, the Core i5-2500 is slightly slower than the Core i3-7100T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-2500
No clear advantages
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 2% faster in F1 25 – 176 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in F1 25
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
F1 25 FPS Calculator
Core i5-2500 vs Core i3-7100T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
176 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
132 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2500 vs Core i3-7100T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2500 vs Core i3-7100T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2500
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2500 Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
