The Core i5-2500 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-4150 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $95.97 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-2500
The Core i3-4150 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i3-4150
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 71% cheaper – $39.90 vs $135.87
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
Core i5-2500 vs Core i3-4150 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-2500
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
170
95%
Min 1% FPS
114
96%
Price, $
$135.87
29%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
28%
Core i3-4150
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
179
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Core i5-2500 vs Core i3-4150 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2500 vs Core i3-4150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2500 vs Core i3-4150 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2500
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-4150
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-2500 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Not Available | MSRP | $117.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
95 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |