In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-2435M is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-10700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-2435M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6 – 86 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2011
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-2435M vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
65 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2435M vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2435M vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2435M
Sep 1st, 2011
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2435M Sep 1st, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2011 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
