In Atomfall, the Core i5-2410M is slower than the Core i9-12900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-2410M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 239 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 9 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Feb 01, 2011
- Is 10 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-2410M vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
239 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
100%
Price, $
$289
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2410M vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2410M vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2410M
Feb 1st, 2011
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2410M Feb 1st, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 1st, 2011 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
