In Rust, the Core i5-2400S is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $103 cheaper!
Core i5-2400S
- Up to 36% cheaper – $184.83 vs $288.00
- Up to 36% cheaper
- Up to 15% better value in Rust – $0.88 vs $1.03/FPS
- Up to 15% better value in Rust
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 33% faster in Rust – 278 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Rust
- Is 13 years and 11 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 13 years and 11 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-2400S vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
209 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
46%
Price, $
$184.83
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
278 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
64%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
85%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2400S vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2400S vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2400S Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
