In Deathloop, the Core i5-2400S is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $375 cheaper!
Core i5-2400S
- Up to 67% cheaper – $184.83 vs $559.99
- Up to 67% cheaper
- Up to 64% better value in Deathloop – $0.83 vs $2.32/FPS
- Up to 64% better value in Deathloop
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop – 241 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-2400S vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
221 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
92%
Price, $
$184.83
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
241 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
33%
Value, $/FPS
$2.32/FPS
36%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2400S vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2400S vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
57%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2400S Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
