In Deathloop, the Core i5-2400S is same performance as the Core i5-9600KF. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $35 cheaper!
Core i5-2400S
- Up to 16% cheaper – $184.83 vs $219.88
- Up to 16% cheaper
- Up to 16% better value in Deathloop – $0.83 vs $0.99/FPS
- Up to 16% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9600KF
- Is 7 years and 11 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 7 years and 11 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-2400S vs Core i5-9600KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$184.83
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.88
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
84%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2400S vs Core i5-9600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2400S vs Core i5-9600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2400S Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600KF Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
