The Core i5-2400 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-9900, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $558.71 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i5-2400
- Up to 84% cheaper – $108.70 vs $667.41
- A much better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i9-9900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Core i5-2400 vs Core i9-9900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-2400
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
169
89%
Min 1% FPS
113
90%
Price, $
$108.7
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
190
100%
Min 1% FPS
126
100%
Price, $
$667.41
16%
Value, $/FPS
$3.51/FPS
18%
Core i5-2400 vs Core i9-9900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2400 vs Core i9-9900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2400 vs Core i9-9900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2400
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-2400 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | $423.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.0 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |