In Deathloop, the Core i5-2400 is slightly slower than the Core i9-12900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $159 cheaper!
Core i5-2400
- Up to 55% cheaper – $129.94 vs $289.00
- Up to 55% cheaper
- Up to 52% better value in Deathloop – $0.58 vs $1.21/FPS
- Up to 52% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop – 237 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 9 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 10 years and 9 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-2400 vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-2400
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
221 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
94%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
237 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
177 FPS
100%
Price, $
$289
44%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
48%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-2400 vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-2400 vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-2400
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-2400 Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
