In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-14600T is slightly slower than the Core i3-7100T and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $586 more expensive!
Core i5-14600T
- Is 7 years and 4 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 7 years and 4 days newer
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 182 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 96% cheaper – $25.00 vs $611.10
- Up to 96% cheaper
- Up to 96% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.13 vs $3.61/FPS
- Up to 96% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-14600T vs Core i3-7100T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-14600T
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
169 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
126 FPS
93%
Price, $
$611.1
4%
Value, $/FPS
$3.61/FPS
4%
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
182 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-14600T vs Core i3-7100T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-14600T vs Core i3-7100T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-14600T
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-14600T Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $255.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
