In Deathloop, the Core i5-14600T is slightly faster than the Core i3-4330. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $441 more expensive!
Core i5-14600T
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop – 234 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Core i3-4330
- Up to 72% cheaper – $169.95 vs $611.10
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 70% better value in Deathloop – $0.77 vs $2.61/FPS
- Up to 70% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-14600T vs Core i3-4330: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-14600T
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
234 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
176 FPS
100%
Price, $
$611.1
27%
Value, $/FPS
$2.61/FPS
30%
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
218 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
93%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-14600T vs Core i3-4330 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-14600T vs Core i3-4330 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-14600T
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
4 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-14600T Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4330 Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $255.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
