In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-14600T is slower than the Core i3-330M and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $512 more expensive!
Core i5-14600T
- Is 14 years newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 14 years newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 27% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 214 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 27% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 84% cheaper – $98.95 vs $611.10
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 87% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.46 vs $3.61/FPS
- Up to 87% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-14600T vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-14600T
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
169 FPS
79%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
79%
Price, $
$611.1
16%
Value, $/FPS
$3.61/FPS
13%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
214 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-14600T vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-14600T vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-14600T
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
19%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-14600T Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $255.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
