In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-14600T is slower than the Core i3-3110M and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $541 more expensive!
Core i5-14600T
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
Core i3-3110M
- Up to 21% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 205 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 89% cheaper – $69.95 vs $611.10
- Up to 89% cheaper
- Up to 91% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.34 vs $3.61/FPS
- Up to 91% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-14600T vs Core i3-3110M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-14600T
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
169 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
126 FPS
82%
Price, $
$611.1
11%
Value, $/FPS
$3.61/FPS
9%
Core i3-3110M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
205 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$69.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-14600T vs Core i3-3110M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-14600T vs Core i3-3110M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-14600T
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-3110M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-14600T Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3110M Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| $255.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | unknown |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
