Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600K.
Advantages of Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i5-11600K - 207 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-11600K
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - $199.00 vs $219.98
- Up to 8% better value when playing Control than Core i5-14600KF - $0.97 vs $1.06 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
207
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
92%
Price, $
$219.98
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for $219.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6754 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6755 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-14600KF | vs | Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |