The Core i5-14600K is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Pentium G640, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $215.70 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-14600K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Pentium G640
- Up to 90% cheaper – $24.29 vs $239.99
- A better value for money for gaming
Core i5-14600K vs Pentium G640 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-14600K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
217
100%
Min 1% FPS
142
100%
Price, $
$239.99
10%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
13%
Pentium G640
Jun 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
167
77%
Min 1% FPS
112
79%
Price, $
$24.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Core i5-14600K vs Pentium G640 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-14600K vs Pentium G640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-14600K vs Pentium G640 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-14600K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Pentium G640
Jun 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-14600K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Pentium G640 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
$319.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Not Available | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
24 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |