Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 83 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-14400F - 148 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - $164.99 vs $239.99
- Up to 29% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-14600K - $1.15 vs $1.62 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.62/FPS
71%
Price, $
$239.99
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1774 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
144
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$164.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $164.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1774 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-14600K | vs | Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |