Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 651 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-12400F - 219 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - $110.61 vs $239.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-14600K - $0.54 vs $1.10 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
219
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
49%
Price, $
$239.99
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1755 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $110.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1756 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-14600K | vs | Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |