In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-14400F is slightly slower than the Xeon E3-1260L. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-14400F
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer
Xeon E3-1260L
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 196 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-14400F vs Xeon E3-1260L: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-14400F vs Xeon E3-1260L in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-14400F vs Xeon E3-1260L in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1260L
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1260L Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| $196.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
