Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 734 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $164.99 vs $359.99
- Up to 53% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-12900F - $0.20 vs $0.43 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Minecraft than Core i5-14400F - 842 vs 821 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
821
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$164.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $164.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7486 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
842
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
47%
Price, $
$359.99
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $359.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7486 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-14400F | vs | Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |