Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-8700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-8700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 2198 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-8700.
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-8700 - 220 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i7-8700
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $135.47 vs $164.97
- Up to 12% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-14400F - $0.66 vs $0.75 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
88%
Price, $
$164.97
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for $164.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 406 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
206
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$135.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $135.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 407 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-14400F | vs | Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |