In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-14400F is slower than the Core i7-820QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-14400F
- Is 14 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 23, 2009
- Is 14 years and 3 months newer
Core i7-820QM
- Up to 23% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 208 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-14400F vs Core i7-820QM: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-14400F vs Core i7-820QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-14400F vs Core i7-820QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i7-820QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
1.733 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.067 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
28%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-820QM Sep 23rd, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Sep 23rd, 2009 |
$196.00 | MSRP | $546.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | None |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
