In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i5-14400F is quite a bit faster than the Core i7-2630QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-14400F
- Up to 43% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 149 vs 104 FPS
- Up to 43% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 13 years and 4 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 13 years and 4 days newer
Core i7-2630QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i5-14400F vs Core i7-2630QM: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-14400F vs Core i7-2630QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-14400F vs Core i7-2630QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i7-2630QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
62%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-2630QM Jan 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2011 |
| $196.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | unknown |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
