Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 734 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-12400F - 150 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $111.34 vs $164.99
- Up to 31% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-14400F - $0.76 vs $1.10 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $164.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
146
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$111.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $111.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 279 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-14400F | vs | Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |