In Counter-Strike 2, the Core i5-14400 is much faster than the Xeon E5620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-14400
- Up to 62% faster in Counter-Strike 2 – 390 vs 241 FPS
- Up to 62% faster in Counter-Strike 2
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5620
No clear advantages
Counter-Strike 2 FPS Calculator
Core i5-14400 vs Xeon E5620: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-14400
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
390 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
233 FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-14400 vs Xeon E5620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-14400 vs Xeon E5620 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-14400
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
57%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-14400 Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $221.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
