The Core i5-14400 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-4670, however, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $110.88 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-14400
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-4670
- Up to 55% cheaper – $89.11 vs $199.99
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
Core i5-14400 vs Core i5-4670 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-14400
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
207
100%
Min 1% FPS
136
100%
Price, $
$199.99
44%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
50%
Core i5-4670
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
182
88%
Min 1% FPS
121
89%
Price, $
$89.11
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Core i5-14400 vs Core i5-4670 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-14400 vs Core i5-4670 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-14400 vs Core i5-4670 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-14400
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i5-4670
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-14400 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
$221.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Not Available | Power Consumption | 84 W |
Performance | ||
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
20 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |