In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i5-14400 is quite a bit faster than the Core i3-330M. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $94 more expensive!
Core i5-14400
- Up to 46% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 149 vs 102 FPS
- Up to 46% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 14 years newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 14 years newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 49% cheaper – $98.95 vs $192.45
- Up to 49% cheaper
- Up to 25% better value in The Callisto Protocol – $0.97 vs $1.29/FPS
- Up to 25% better value in The Callisto Protocol
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i5-14400 vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-14400
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
149 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
108 FPS
100%
Price, $
$192.45
51%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
75%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
102 FPS
68%
Min 1% FPS
70 FPS
65%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-14400 vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-14400 vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-14400
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
22%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-14400 Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $221.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
