In Deathloop, the Core i5-13500T is slightly faster than the Xeon E5520. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-13500T
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5520
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-13500T vs Xeon E5520: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-13500T vs Xeon E5520 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-13500T vs Xeon E5520 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-13500T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
8 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
55%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-13500T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| $232.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
