In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-13500 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-13500
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Aug 10, 2017
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 65 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 175 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-13500 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
175 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
100%
Price, $
$850
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.85/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-13500 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-13500 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-13500
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
14-core
88%
L3 Cache
24 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-13500 Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Aug 10th, 2017 |
$242.00 | MSRP | $999.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | SP3r2 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
