The Core i5-13500 is a much faster gaming CPU than the Core i7-11375H. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-13500
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the Core i7-11375H
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Core i5-13500 vs Core i7-11375H for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-13500
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
208
100%
Min 1% FPS
137
100%
Price, $
$259.43
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
100%
Core i7-11375H
Jan 11th, 2021
Average FPS
194
93%
Min 1% FPS
128
93%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i5-13500 vs Core i7-11375H in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-13500 vs Core i7-11375H in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-13500 vs Core i7-11375H in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-13500
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
96%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i7-11375H
Jan 11th, 2021
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
12 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-13500 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-11375H |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 11th, 2021 |
$242.00 | MSRP | $482.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel BGA 1449 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.0 GHz |
24 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Iris XE 96EU |
| No | Overclockable | No |
