In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-13400T is quite a bit faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-13400T
- Up to 26% faster in Battlefield 6 – 93 vs 74 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Aug 10, 2017
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 35 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
74 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
56 FPS
80%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.7/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-13400T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
83%
L3 Cache
20 MB
62%
Base Frequency
1.3 GHz
37%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-13400T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Aug 10th, 2017 |
$221.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | SP3r2 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
