In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i5-13400T is faster than the Core i7-980X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-13400T
- Up to 18% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 111 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-980X
No clear advantages
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i5-13400T vs Core i7-980X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Average FPS
94 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
67 FPS
81%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-13400T vs Core i7-980X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-13400T vs Core i7-980X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-13400T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.3 GHz
39%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-13400T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-980X Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $221.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
