In Elden Ring, the Core i5-13400T is slightly slower than the Core i7-960. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-13400T
- Is 13 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 20, 2009
- Is 13 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-960
- Up to 1% faster in Elden Ring – 140 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Elden Ring
Elden Ring FPS Calculator
Core i5-13400T vs Core i7-960: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Average FPS
140 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
95%
Price, $
$200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-13400T vs Core i7-960 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-13400T vs Core i7-960 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-13400T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.3 GHz
41%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-13400T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-960 Oct 20th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 20th, 2009 |
| $221.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
