In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i5-13400T is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-13400T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 15% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 128 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 1 year and 3 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 04, 2023
- Is 1 year and 3 days newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i5-13400T vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
128 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
96 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-13400T vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-13400T vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-13400T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
50%
L3 Cache
20 MB
61%
Base Frequency
1.3 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
81%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
86%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-13400T Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$221.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
