Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900 and the more expensive Core i5-13400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 8% better in Rust than Core i5-13400F - 256 vs 236 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $480.00 vs $899.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-13400F - $1.88 vs $3.81 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 423 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
256
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$480
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $480 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 424 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F | vs | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |