Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900F is 365 days older than the more expensive Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-13400F - 146 vs 143 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $359.99 vs $899.99
- Up to 61% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-13400F - $2.47 vs $6.29 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$359.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $359.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F | vs | Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |