Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10940X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10940X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1173 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10940X.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-10940X - 127 vs 115 FPS
Advantages of Core i9-10940X
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $755.00 vs $899.99
- Up to 7% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-13400F - $6.57 vs $7.09 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 28 vs 16 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.09/FPS
93%
Price, $
$899.99
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
115
91%
Value, $/FPS
$6.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$755
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $755 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F | vs | Core i9-10940X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 28 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 165 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |