In Atomfall, the Core i5-13400F is slightly faster than the Core i7-9700F and it's also a slightly better value for money, as it's $7 cheaper!
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall – 231 vs 215 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 3% cheaper – $240.23 vs $246.80
- Up to 3% cheaper
- Up to 10% better value in Atomfall – $1.03 vs $1.14/FPS
- Up to 10% better value in Atomfall
Core i7-9700F
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$240.23
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
215 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
93%
Price, $
$246.8
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
90%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
98%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$196.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
