In Atomfall, the Core i5-13400F is faster than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 231 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
22%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
$196.00 | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
