In Atomfall, the Core i5-13400 is faster than the Xeon E3-1240. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-13400
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 230 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E3-1240
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-13400 vs Xeon E3-1240: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-13400 vs Xeon E3-1240 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-13400 vs Xeon E3-1240 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-13400
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1240
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-13400 Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1240 Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| $221.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1155 |
65W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
