In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-13400 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 1700X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-13400
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 02, 2017
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 1700X
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 178 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-13400 vs Ryzen 7 1700X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 1700X
Mar 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
178 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
133 FPS
100%
Price, $
$195.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-13400 vs Ryzen 7 1700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-13400 vs Ryzen 7 1700X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-13400
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Ryzen 7 1700X
Mar 2nd, 2017
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
16 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-13400 Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 1700X Mar 2nd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
$221.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | AM4 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
