Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 286 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-13400.
Advantages of Core i5-13400
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $175.05 vs $432.98
- Up to 53% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-14900KF - $0.72 vs $1.52 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-13400 - 285 vs 243 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400 - 32 vs 16 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
243
85%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $175.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
285
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
47%
Price, $
$432.98
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |